[haskell-llvm] Maintainership still ongoing?

[Scott West]

>
> I complained about fP128Type vs. FFI.fp128Type issue before.
>

I'd be in favour of  a more open commit-relationship if possible, so you 
could commit easy things like this directly.

>> Apparently the new hotness is llvm-general, which is fine, but:
>
> llvm-general is mentioned in the responses of the ticket. I have not
> heard of llvm-general before. I would prefer if the maintainers would
> announce such changes in this mailing list.
>

I would as well: I don't think the Haskell LLVM ecosystem is so diverse 
that we need more than one method for public information distribution :).

Regards,
Scott